Not sure where to start? Take a guided tour.
AI Site Grader
AI Query Scanner
llms.txt GeneratorRoam Chapter
38of 40Tampa families
Why AI picks it
- Lists indoor backup stopsRoam Chapter website
- States family age limitsRoam Chapter guide
ChatGPT says
“Pairs outdoor trips with indoor backups.”
Be in the itinerary AI writes.
See when AI includes your tour, destination, route or experience, which public sources shape the shortlist, and what your team can improve next.
“Build a three-day family itinerary for Tampa, including things to do when it rains.”40 answers
See every shortlist you’re on.
Buyers ask the same thing a hundred ways, and each question gets its own picks. Track the questions that matter and see how far you are from the top.
Tampa family trips
Trekmont Tours 4th, in 14 of 40
First-time Italy
Trekmont Tours 1st, in 37 of 40
Japan by train
Trekmont Tours 2nd, in 31 of 40
Costa Rica adventures
Trekmont Tours 2nd, in 30 of 40
Rainy-day Austin
Trekmont Tours 4th, in 21 of 40
- Trekmont Tours
- Rivals
- Your gap to first
40 AI answers per question. Height shows how many named each brand.
Explore the evidenceGive AI a reason to pick you.
Trakkr reads the pages behind every pick. When AI can’t find what it needs, Trakkr writes the fix and ships it once you approve.
- You approve every change
- Ships to Shopify, WordPress, Webflow and GitHub
Trekmont Tours
14of 40Tampa family trips
- Indoor family tour options are missing.Trekmont Tours website
Follow every pick to your site.
Connect Google Analytics to see AI referral visits and landing pages. Recorded conversions depend on the events and values configured in your property.
30 days · AI referral visits
Mini bars show 30 days of AI visits.
Google Analytics attributionThe shortlist forms before the click.
Select a planning question. Trakkr keeps the itinerary position, evidence, alternative and next action in one trace.
Inclusion rate
28.7%
Itinerary position
Day 2, not included
Answer readout
The answer builds day two around an aquarium, a museum and an indoor food stop. It cites local listings and publisher roundups, not Trekmont's owned rainy-day route.
The destination is named, but the Trekmont programme is absent from indoor and family planning branches.
Evidence in the answer
- Destination websiteOwnedMixed evidence
- Tripadvisor things to doReviewsSupports inclusion
- Local family publisherPublisherSource gap
Action created
Create a three-day family itinerary with verified indoor venues, travel times and a clear wet-weather branch.
Leading alternative
Harbour & Hallows
Open the full readout.
Switch views to see how Trakkr breaks down visibility for tour operators and destination marketers, from the market to the work that moves it.
Find the route, season or traveller need behind the average.
A portfolio score is only the opening signal. Move into a destination, programme, season, activity and traveller segment before deciding what to change.
Portfolio inclusion
43.0%
Owned citation share
28.0%
Open actions
8
ProductMarketInclusionChangeOwned share
Italy small group
Strongest: Autumn
Rome and Tuscany
Inclusion61.8%
Change+4.3
Owned share38.4%
First-timer detail wins inclusion; independent route proof remains thin.
Japan first visit
Strongest: Spring
Tokyo and Kyoto
Inclusion43.6%
Change-2.1
Owned share29.7%
Station logistics and meeting-point proof move the main route to a peer.
Costa Rica adventure
Strongest: Winter
Arenal and Monteverde
Inclusion37.9%
Change+1.6
Owned share24.1%
Broad sustainability copy is not strong enough to support the claim.
Tampa family programme
Strongest: Summer
Tampa Bay
Inclusion28.7%
Change-4.8
Owned share19.8%
Rainy-day intent is present, but no timed family itinerary is cited.
Destination and season heatmap
DestinationSpringSummerAutumnWinter
Rome + Tuscany
66%
52%
73%
41%
Tokyo + Kyoto
68%
37%
58%
44%
Arenal + Monteverde
42%
31%
35%
64%
Tampa Bay
39%
47%
28%
34%
Rome + Tuscany
- Spring
- 66%
- Summer
- 52%
- Autumn
- 73%
- Winter
- 41%
Tokyo + Kyoto
- Spring
- 68%
- Summer
- 37%
- Autumn
- 58%
- Winter
- 44%
Arenal + Monteverde
- Spring
- 42%
- Summer
- 31%
- Autumn
- 35%
- Winter
- 64%
Tampa Bay
- Spring
- 39%
- Summer
- 47%
- Autumn
- 28%
- Winter
- 34%
Activity and traveller matrix
ActivityFirst timeFamilySmall groupAccess needs
Culture and history
72%
46%
63%
28%
Food and local life
61%
43%
67%
36%
Nature and adventure
44%
31%
58%
19%
Wet-weather plans
37%
29%
33%
24%
Culture and history
- First time
- 72%
- Family
- 46%
- Small group
- 63%
- Access needs
- 28%
Food and local life
- First time
- 61%
- Family
- 43%
- Small group
- 67%
- Access needs
- 36%
Nature and adventure
- First time
- 44%
- Family
- 31%
- Small group
- 58%
- Access needs
- 19%
Wet-weather plans
- First time
- 37%
- Family
- 29%
- Small group
- 33%
- Access needs
- 24%
View 1 of 4
See who supplies the facts in the itinerary.
Owned pages, marketplaces, reviews, local profiles, publishers and communities do different jobs. Trakkr shows where useful proof lives and where the recommendation depends on sources you do not control.
Owned sites
27.8%Route pages, destination guides, FAQs
Owned pages explain the offer, but often lack the timed itinerary and local proof used in the answer.
Marketplaces
35.4%Viator, GetYourGuide
Marketplace detail and reviews carry more of the recommendation than the team controls.
Reviews and local
18.9%Tripadvisor, Google local profiles
Recent review themes and consistent place facts help answer practical planning questions.
Publishers and community
17.9%Travel publishers, local blogs, Reddit, YouTube
Independent itinerary and route coverage is the clearest source gap.
Source gap graph
Coverage against the reference level
Owned route pages
Detailed, but practical route facts are split across pages.
72 / 80
Marketplace listings
Strong coverage creates distribution dependence.
88 / 80
Independent publishers
The largest gap in the current answer set.
31 / 70
Reviews and local proof
Useful evidence, with two recurring detail conflicts.
64 / 70
View 2 of 4
Compare the journey, not just the brand name.
Route-level comparisons show exactly where an alternative wins the main itinerary and what evidence creates the gap.
RoutePlanning momentTrekmontAlternative
Rome to Tuscany
First-time, 7 days
Trekmont61.8%
Juniper Small Group56.4%
Juniper Small Group
Trekmont leads on pacing, but the peer has stronger publisher proof.
Tokyo to Kyoto
Rail, first visit
Trekmont43.6%
Field Note Japan58.1%
Field Note Japan
The peer explains station transfers and luggage handling more clearly.
Arenal to Monteverde
Small-group adventure
Trekmont37.9%
Cedar Coast Adventures49.3%
Cedar Coast Adventures
Trekmont needs verified, specific sustainability and guide evidence.
Tampa wet-weather loop
Family, 3 days
Trekmont28.7%
Harbour & Hallows45.2%
Harbour & Hallows
The peer supplies a timed indoor route supported by local publishers.
View 3 of 4
Turn the gap into work a team can own.
Every item starts with an observed answer or source gap. Changing facts and sensitive claims stay blocked until the operating team verifies them.
Trekmont itinerary queue
Work is tied to an observed answer or source gap
Build the Tampa rainy-day family itinerary
HighItineraryThe destination is named in 34 prompts, but its programme enters only 9 itineraries.
Expected signal: A verified three-day indoor branch is cited and included.
Destination content
Publish the Tokyo to Kyoto transfer route
HighRouteStation, luggage and first-night details sit across three pages.
Expected signal: The operator holds the main first-timer rail route.
Product
Create the autumn Italy pacing guide
MediumSeasonalAutumn inclusion is high, but the source set depends on marketplaces.
Expected signal: Owned seasonal guidance earns a larger citation share.
Campaigns
Verify access details for the Rome walking route
HighAccessibilityThe route page uses general access language without stop-level evidence.
Expected signal: Only checked access facts appear in the route and answer set.
Operations
Substantiate Costa Rica sustainability claims
HighSustainabilityAI omits the programme when it cannot verify broad claims.
Expected signal: Specific, approved evidence replaces unsupported language.
Operations
Reconcile the Kyoto meeting point
HighLocal proofThe operator site and marketplace listing name different entrances.
Expected signal: Owned, marketplace and local facts agree.
Distribution
Answer the repeated family pacing question
MediumReviewRecent reviews ask whether long days suit younger children.
Expected signal: The itinerary and review responses explain pacing with checked facts.
Guest experience
Pitch the Tampa indoor route to a local publisher
MediumPublisher sourcePublisher coverage supports every leading rainy-day alternative.
Expected signal: An independent local source corroborates the itinerary.
PR
View 4 of 4
Measure the real planning context.
Prompt, place, season, traveller need, model, source and check date stay attached. That makes movement explainable.
- 01Define the planning moment
Group prompts by market, season, traveller, trip length, activity and constraint.
- 02Read the itinerary
Record whether the destination or product appears, where it sits, what alternatives are named and what claims are made.
- 03Trace the sources
Separate owned pages from marketplaces, reviews, local profiles, publishers and communities.
- 04Diagnose the unit
Move from the portfolio signal to a market, route, programme, location or use case.
- 05Create checked work
Assign a route, itinerary, seasonal, access, sustainability, local-proof, review or publisher-source action.
Peer set: Intrepid Travel, G Adventures, Trafalgar, Visit California.
Public sources behind the category model
Google SearchAI-powered trip ideas in SearchGoogle describes AI itineraries that combine attractions, restaurants, reviews, photos and Business Profile details from across the web.Google Things to doContent and referral experience policiesOfficial guidance requires product data, titles and landing pages to match the experience offered and provide a clear path to the specific product.GetYourGuideHow activity ranking worksThe marketplace says traveller preference, market behaviour and activity performance influence search ranking.TripadvisorHow the popularity ranking worksTripadvisor explains how review quality, recency, quantity and consistency shape its popularity ranking.UN TourismAccessible tourism destination criteriaThe criteria span planning information, reservations, transport, accommodation, food, attractions and public services across the visitor journey.
Every answer and figure in the examples on this page is made up to show how Trakkr works, including those for real brands. The other company names are made up too.
Questions, answered.
The practical questions behind travel AI visibility.
Ask anything elseAsk anything else
The Agent answers from our docs, methods and pricing, and links to the source.
Be the pick.
Add your website and the questions your buyers ask. Track the answers, inspect the evidence and decide which changes to make.
- 14-day free trial
- Cancel anytime
- You approve every change
Every question your buyers askchecked daily in eight AI models