Skip to content

What sites do ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google cite?

A combined, privacy-filtered index of the domains and URLs exposed as sources across monitored AI answers. It shows source patterns across the panel, not provider market share or provider-by-provider preferences.

Published
17 December 2025
Updated
14 October 2026
Window
3 October 2025 to 14 October 2026
Reading
10 minutes
Magnifying glass inspecting a field of citation sources

Study 001 · Snapshot

citation appearances
87,313,920
unique cited domains
767,313
tracked brands
1,999
unique URLs
3,945,269
Figure 1Citation Sources. The numbers on the card come from the published study data; read each figure’s limits before citing it.Jump to the findings

In short

Four findings, strongest first
  1. 87.3M

    citation appearances across 767,313 domains and 3,945,269 URLs.

    Chapter 01
  2. 5.7%

    of appearances go to the three most-cited domains. The long tail is the larger story.

    Chapter 01
  3. 88.64%

    of appearances sit outside the named source taxonomy: a classification limit, not a quality judgement.

    Chapter 04
  4. 31.1%

    of classified prompt records are “best of” questions, the largest named intent.

    Chapter 05

The index is broad, not dominated by one source.

Provenance

Evidence behind the findings

The index is broad but not dominated by one source. Its biggest analytical limit is classification coverage: 88.64% of citation appearances sit outside the current named source taxonomy.

Verified snapshot2026-10-14

80.8M

Citation appearances

Sum of citation appearance counts in the latest valid snapshot for each tracked brand.

Verified snapshot2026-10-14

725.8K

Unique cited domains

Distinct normalized domains present in the current brand citation snapshots.

Verified snapshot2026-10-14

5.8%

Top three domain share

Share of citation appearances attributed to the three most-cited domains in the current snapshot.

Verified snapshot2026-10-14

88.4%

Unclassified source share

Citation share assigned to “other” because the source domain is not in the hand-maintained category map.

Ten most-cited domains
youtube.com2.67%

2,331,894 appearances

google.com1.58%

1,383,643 appearances

reddit.com1.44%

1,257,547 appearances

en.wikipedia.org1.27%

1,112,883 appearances

linkedin.com0.69%

602,956 appearances

facebook.com0.50%

439,069 appearances

edmunds.com0.40%

347,352 appearances

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov0.37%

319,694 appearances

cars.com0.35%

307,472 appearances

instagram.com0.29%

250,193 appearances

How to read this

Count: one source can appear repeatedly across responses and tracked brands, so citation appearances exceed unique URLs.

Concentration: the top three domains hold 5.7%. This describes the tracked panel, not the full web.

Selection: the index reflects prompts tracked for participating brands. It is not a random sample of all questions asked of AI systems.

Attribution: model and geography fields are not retained in this public aggregate. They are not inferred.

Press summary and practical use.

Citation appearances

87,313,920

Unique cited URLs

3,945,269

Top-three share

5.7%

Unclassified share

88.64%

The short version for journalists and analysts

The current index combines citation appearances observed across monitored ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, and Google AI surfaces. youtube.com, google.com and reddit.com lead the domain table, but together they account for only 5.7% of appearances.

The long tail is the larger story: the index covers 767,313 unique cited domains and 3,945,269 URLs across 1,999 tracked brands.

This public aggregate does not retain provider attribution. It cannot say that ChatGPT prefers one source while Perplexity or Google prefers another, and it cannot establish that a page trait caused a citation.

Use the data without overclaiming

  1. Search the domain table to see whether owned, competitor, publisher, community, or reference sites appear.
  2. Use the separate page-type study to inspect formats. Raw page URLs are not published in this privacy-filtered aggregate.
  3. Track the same prompt set over time before treating a source gap as an action target.

Search the domain index.

The explorer covers the top 5,000 domains in the public slim export. Rows with fewer than 3 contributing brands are excluded here and from the download.

4,388 privacy-qualified domains in the slim exportMinimum 3 brands
AI Citation Index domain ranking
RankDomainCitationsShareURLsBrandsType
1youtube.com2,331,8942.67%132,2801,468Social / UGC
2google.com1,383,6431.58%95,852961Other
3reddit.com1,257,5471.44%63,9061,656Social / UGC
4en.wikipedia.org1,112,8831.27%27,0351,864Reference
5linkedin.com602,9560.69%40,5371,466Social / UGC
6facebook.com439,0690.50%30,6111,201Social / UGC
7edmunds.com347,3520.40%9,577128Other
8pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov319,6940.37%13,266513Academic
9cars.com307,4720.35%8,442135Other
10instagram.com250,1930.29%19,3871,055Social / UGC
11forbes.com234,8380.27%7,0921,109News & Media
12kbb.com232,1390.27%4,798136Other
13g2.com230,1680.26%10,415781Review Sites
14gartner.com212,7730.24%7,391626Other
15autotrader.com211,8800.24%6,590112Other
16cargurus.com185,5500.21%5,573119Other
17carfax.com171,7990.20%3,830117Other
18play.google.com162,4520.19%8,815576App Stores
19techradar.com160,9210.18%2,929865Tech Publications
20dealerrater.com153,0320.18%2,975106Other
21apps.apple.com152,3690.17%8,998608App Stores
22yelp.com148,2160.17%4,534335Review Sites
23clutch.co147,2260.17%4,289356Other
24f6s.com144,5750.17%5,895781Other
25caranddriver.com142,0700.16%2,833146Other
26worldmetrics.org130,0890.15%5,422594Other
27truecar.com121,5950.14%2,871110Other
28caredge.com111,0530.13%1,415110Other
29wifitalents.com101,2770.12%5,124600Other
30tripadvisor.com100,2070.11%3,958162Review Sites
31consumerreports.org93,2680.11%2,053280Review Sites
32gitnux.org92,9430.11%4,913600Other
33nerdwallet.com90,4680.10%2,597320Other
34medium.com89,2650.10%6,594817Social / UGC
35dqsglobal.com82,2440.09%1,85417Other
36capitalone.com80,3920.09%2,713154Other
37zipdo.co80,1250.09%3,791557Other
38sciencedirect.com79,1000.09%4,981488Academic
39toyota.com76,6140.09%2,02376Other
40amazon.com74,8830.09%5,174312E-commerce
41guideflow.com72,3300.08%1,235464Other
42salesforce.com71,7300.08%2,653423Other
43quora.com71,2410.08%4,857790Social / UGC
44landroverusa.com69,4820.08%26637Other
45gov.uk67,3260.08%2,392205Other
46iseecars.com66,1690.08%1,324100Other
47capterra.com64,7840.07%3,286504Review Sites
48shopify.com63,7470.07%2,298276E-commerce
49learn.microsoft.com63,0010.07%3,445299Official Docs
50learn.g2.com62,0440.07%775498Review Sites

Named source types cover a minority.

Named types cover a minority of the index

The classifier uses a hand-maintained domain map. Social sources account for 5.96% and reference sources for 1.4% of the current index, but “other” still holds 88.64%. That makes named category comparisons directional, not comprehensive.

“Best of” questions lead the named intents.

Prompts are assigned to rule-based intent groups. “Best of” represents 31.1% of classified prompt records, while 53.7% remain “other”. The index publishes aggregate prompt counts, never prompt text.

Based on 57,305 unique prompts
Best Of31.1% of queries

"Best of" and "top X" queries often surface review sites and curated lists. Reddit and user-generated content sites perform well here.

Top sources
youtube.comreddit.comen.wikipedia.orggoogle.comforbes.comwirecutter.comtechradar.comcnet.comtomsguide.compcmag.comengadget.comtheverge.comgizmodo.comzdnet.comtrustpilot.comg2.comcapterra.comsoftwareadvice.comgetapp.comproducthunt.comalternativeto.netslant.cotrustradius.comgartner.comforrester.comconsumerreports.orggoodhousekeeping.combuzzfeed.combusinessinsider.comwired.comlifehacker.commakeuseof.comhowtogeek.comdigitaltrends.comlaptopmag.comandroidauthority.com9to5mac.commacrumors.comimore.comwindowscentral.comandroidcentral.comxda-developers.comslickdeals.netnytimes.comwsj.comtheguardian.combbc.combloomberg.comtechcrunch.comarstechnica.comanandtech.comtomshardware.comnotebookcheck.netrtings.comsoundguys.comwhatifi.comreviewed.combestreviews.comthespruce.combobvila.comfamilyhandyman.compopularmechanics.comwired.co.uktechspot.comguru3d.comoverclock.netlinus.techgamersNexus.neteurogamer.netpolygon.com

How the index has moved.

Daily points are plotted as observed. Missing snapshots remain gaps. Movement can reflect new citation behavior, a changed tracked panel, or both, so the chart is descriptive rather than causal.

Loading observed historical snapshots

The verified current snapshot and aggregate CSV remain available above. Historical points are loaded separately, and missing dates are never interpolated.

What this data can and can’t answer.

What this dataset can answer

Cited domains and source shareAvailable

Available for the 5,000 domains in the public slim export. The download applies a minimum of three contributing brands.

Source categoriesLimited

Available through a hand-maintained domain map, but most citations remain in “other”. Category shares are partial.

Prompt intentLimited

Available as aggregate prompt counts across six rule-based intent groups. Raw prompts are not published.

Historical movementLimited

Daily aggregate snapshots show index movement. Changes can reflect both citation behavior and panel composition.

Model differencesNot available

Provider attribution is not retained in this public aggregate, so the index does not claim model-by-model source differences.

Response citation rateNot available

The public index has citation appearances but no denominator for all responses, including responses with no citations.

Page typeNot available

This export holds domain and URL counts, not page classifications. A separate reviewed page-type study is linked below.

Geography and languageNot available

Prompt geography and language are not preserved in the public aggregate.

Causal ranking factorsNot available

This is observational data. It cannot establish that a source trait caused a citation.

Method and evidence.

Methodology

Method and dataset coverage

AI Citation Index

Verified snapshot

Verified 2026-10-14

Records
80,769,585 citation appearances, 3,687,821 unique URLs, 725,777 domains, and 1,928 tracked brands
Dates
2025-10-03 to 2026-10-14
Sampling
Latest valid citation snapshot per tracked brand. Counts are appearance counts within those snapshots, not a census of all AI answers.
Model scope
The public aggregate does not retain provider-level attribution, so model comparisons and response-level citation rates are unavailable.
Geography
Prompt and response geography is not retained in the public aggregate.
Privacy
Downloads include aggregate domain rows seen across at least 3 contributing brands. Raw URLs and customer data are excluded.
Not included
Raw prompts, Raw responses, Customer identities, Account identifiers, Model-level denominators, Geography

Metric ledger

Open any metric to inspect its calculation, sample, scope, and limits.

Definition
Sum of citation appearance counts in the latest valid snapshot for each tracked brand.
Numerator
Not applicable
Denominator
Not applicable
Sample
1,928 tracked brands
Dates
2025-10-03 to 2026-10-14
Model scope
The public aggregate does not retain provider-level attribution, so model comparisons and response-level citation rates are unavailable.
Geography
Prompt and response geography is not retained in the public aggregate.
Limits and confidence
Not unique citations and not a census of all AI answers. A URL can appear more than once. Direct aggregate count from the verified public snapshot.
Review
Verified 2026-10-14. Reviewed by Mack Grenfell.

Download the aggregate data

Aggregate, privacy-filtered files. No customer identities, prompts, account IDs, raw URLs, or absolute traffic volumes.

Definitions

Citation appearance
One observed instance of a source URL appearing in a tracked AI response snapshot. It is not necessarily a unique URL or a unique answer.
Unique cited domain
A normalized hostname with at least one citation appearance in the current brand snapshots.
Verified snapshot
A point-in-time value regenerated from an attributable public aggregate and checked against its numerator, denominator, and coverage metadata.

Update history

2026-10-14

Live evidence refresh

Rebuilt the Citation Index, public rankings and AI Search Traffic Index evidence from 80,769,585 citation appearances, 9,231 ranked brands and 6,286 qualifying GA4 properties, to match the live pages.

2026-08-18

Flagship evidence refresh

Rebuilt the three public research surfaces from 48,422,016 citation appearances and 4,928 qualifying GA4 properties.

2026-05-06

Markdown experiment added

Added the randomized 9,033-page crawler experiment as a reviewed State of AI Search dataset.

2026-03-30

Longitudinal citation study added

Added citation persistence and volatility findings with an explicit 177-day citation observation window.

Corrections

2026-08-18

Citation headline and Wikipedia share

Removed the stale 1.3M citation and 17% Wikipedia claims. The page now resolves current values from the verified Citation Index and records the snapshot date.

2026-08-18

Traffic loading values

Removed invented placeholder growth and source-share values. Loading and failed requests now render as unavailable.

2026-08-18

Live-data description

Replaced “every number is live” with dataset-level status because several reviewed studies are point-in-time snapshots.

Author and reviewer: Mack Grenfell. Generated 14 October 2026 at 18:53 UTC.

How we ran it.

Everything you need to check our work, repeat it or cite it: who ran the study, when, on what data, and where it falls short.

Trakkr Research · Study 001

What sites do ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google cite?

Mack GrenfellFounder, Trakkr. Author and analyst.
Unique domains analyzed
725,777
AI citation appearances analyzed
80,769,585
Tracked brands in current snapshot
1,928
Top three domain share
5.817%

Method

Latest valid citation snapshot per tracked brand, aggregated to domain-level appearance counts with a partial hand-maintained source taxonomy.

Data

citation-index-top-domains.csvAggregates only. No page or customer data.

Cite this study

Grenfell, M. (2025, December 17). What sites do ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google cite? (Trakkr Research Study 001). Trakkr. https://trakkr.ai/trakkr-research/citation-sources

Questions,
answered.

The ones we hear most about this study.

youtube.com ranks first in the 2026-10-28 snapshot with 2,331,894 citation appearances, or 2.67% of the index.

Ask anything about this studyAsk anything about this study

The Agent answers from our docs, methods and pricing, and links to the source.

Sources behind your answers

lope.example
lope.exampleCited in 18 answers this week
reddit.com12 threads, 4 mention a rival
runnersworld.comCites two competitors, not youPitch drafted
wikipedia.orgCategory page, no brand named

Lope, citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews.

See which sources cite your brand.

Trakkr tracks the pages AI answers cite for your questions, yours and your competitors’, so you can see where to earn the next citation.