Skip to content

See where you stand

Change it

Works withWordPressShopifyWebflowGitHubGoogleSlackAll integrations
FixesFixes now ship to WordPress, Shopify, Webflow and GitHub

By team

By goal

Done for you

Not sure where to start? Take a guided tour.Book a demo
Customer storyHow the voice AI company Futuro grew its traffic3×AI traffic in 60 days

Learn

Data and research

FreeAI Site GraderAI Query Scannerllms.txt GeneratorAll free tools
Open dataWhere AI sends people, across more than 6,000 sites

Trakkr vs LLM Pulse

Compare Trakkr and LLM Pulse on AI model coverage, pricing, tracking cadence, integrations, and buyer fit before you choose an AI visibility tracker.

By Mack Grenfell, Founder, Trakkr · An editorial comparisonPublished · Updated

Start with the work you need to do.

Best for

Trakkr

Brands and marketers focused on AI search visibility and understanding how LLMs represent their brand

Best for

LLM Pulse

Cost-conscious or European teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing, unlimited seats and broad integrations across the top AI surfaces

Our reading: the stronger fit depends on your workflow. Check the criteria below, then test both on your own questions.

Compare the details ↓

The full comparison.

Trakkr and LLM Pulse are close on paper. Both are self-serve AI visibility trackers with public pricing, a real free trial, and a feature list well beyond simple mention counting: each watches how assistants describe your brand, tracks citations and competitors, and monitors Reddit and AI crawlers. The differences are quieter, and surface once you look at which models each plan covers, how often the data refreshes, and what the tool expects you to do with a finding. This comparison walks through coverage, cadence, integrations and price so you can see which one matches your team.

“The headline question is not which tool has more features. It is whether you need Trakkr's eight models tracked daily, or whether LLM Pulse's five self-serve surfaces are enough to start.”

AI Model CoverageTrakkrLLM Pulse
ChatGPT tracking
Available
Available
Google AI Overviews tracking
Available
Available
Google AI Mode tracking
Not verified
Available
Perplexity tracking
Available
Available
Gemini tracking
Available
Available
Claude tracking
Available
Enterprise only
Grok tracking
Available
Enterprise only
DeepSeek tracking
Available
Enterprise only
Meta AI tracking
Available
Enterprise only
Monitoring & AnalysisTrakkrLLM Pulse
AI mention tracking
Available
Available
Sentiment analysis
Available
Available
Citation & source tracking
Available
Available
Competitor benchmarking
Available
Available
Reddit intelligence
Available
Available
AI crawler analytics
Available
AI Traffic Analytics from Growth
Cadence & WorkflowTrakkrLLM Pulse
Daily tracking
Available
Weekly
Recommended actions workflow
Available
Not verified
Prompt-level analytics
Available
Available
Integrations & AccessTrakkrLLM Pulse
REST API access
Scale plan
Every public plan
MCP integration
Available
Available
Data Studio connector
Not verified
Every public plan
Unlimited seats
Scale plan
Available
White-label client portals
Available
Custom plan
Pricing & AccessTrakkrLLM Pulse
Transparent public pricing
Available
Available
Free trial
Available
Available
Lower entry price
Not verified
Available
USD billing
Available
Not verified
Pricing notesTrakkrLLM Pulse
Trial
14-day trial
14-day trial
Notes
Growth starts at $100/mo after a 14-day free trial.
Weekly-tracking plans run EUR49-EUR1,199 month to month, from Starter to Scale++. Starter, Growth, and Scale have a 14-day trial. MCP is on every plan; API and the Looker Studio connector start on Scale.

“Not verified” means the sources we checked do not confirm it. The feature may still exist, so ask the vendor. Trakkr publishes $100/mo. LLM Pulse publishes EUR49/mo. Compare billing terms, usage limits, add-ons, and implementation needs before buying. Prices last verified 17 Sep 2026. Confirm current plans before you buy.

Each tool, on its own terms.

Our take on what each product does well and where it stops, side by side and in equal measure.
By toolTrakkrLLM Pulse
In one line
Full model coverage with a finding-to-fix workflow
A broad, transparent self-serve toolkit
Our take

Trakkr Growth starts at $100/mo after a 14-day trial. A free one-off scan is separate from the paid product and is not a 14-day free trial. This comparison uses current public vendor evidence and does not assume unpublished plan terms.

Weekly-tracking plans run EUR49-EUR1,199 month to month, from Starter to Scale++. Starter, Growth, and Scale have a 14-day trial. MCP is on every plan; API and the Looker Studio connector start on Scale. This comparison uses current public vendor evidence and does not assume unpublished plan terms.

Strengths
  • Purpose-built for AI platform monitoring
  • Tracks 8 major AI platforms in real-time
  • Free one-off AI visibility scan, plus a 14-day free trial
  • Prompt-level analytics show exactly which queries trigger mentions
  • Citation tracking reveals where AI gets its data
  • Sentiment analysis across trust, quality, innovation dimensions
  • Transparent EUR pricing ladder with a real 14-day trial and no demo wall
  • Unusually broad surface: tracking, prompt discovery, citations, Reddit and crawler analytics
  • API, Data Studio, REST API, and MCP on every public plan
  • Unlimited seats on every tier
  • Covers the highest-traffic surfaces, ChatGPT, both Google AI surfaces, Gemini and Perplexity, on entry plans
Limitations
  • Newer platform, launched 2024
  • No traditional social media monitoring
  • Limited integrations compared to enterprise tools
  • No hallucination detection (yet)
  • Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI are gated to the Enterprise plan
  • Weekly tracking cadence rather than daily
  • Prompt and project ceilings tighten quickly for busy agencies
  • Pricing is EUR-denominated, so a US budget moves with the exchange rate
  • Feels modular rather than offering one prescriptive next step
Best for
Brands and marketers focused on AI search visibility and understanding how LLMs represent their brand
Cost-conscious or European teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing, unlimited seats and broad integrations across the top AI surfaces
Choose it when
  • Trakkr fits brands and marketers focused on AI search visibility and understanding how LLMs represent their brand.
  • Trakkr: Purpose-built for AI platform monitoring.
  • Trakkr: Tracks 8 major AI platforms in real-time.
  • Trakkr: Free one-off AI visibility scan, plus a 14-day free trial.
  • Entry price is the deciding factor and €49 a month fits the budget better than $100.
  • The five self-serve surfaces, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews, are enough and you do not need Claude or Grok without Enterprise.
  • You need unlimited seats on a small plan, or a native Data Studio connector from Scale.
  • Your team and budget are European and EUR-denominated pricing is convenient.

In short

Trakkr covers more models on every plan and adds an action workflow; LLM Pulse wins on entry price, seats, and integration breadth.

Trakkr is the better fit for teams that want all eight models, daily tracking and a clear path from finding to fix. LLM Pulse is the better fit for cost-conscious or European teams that want low-entry pricing, unlimited seats and deep integrations, and are comfortable tracking the top surfaces while leaving Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI for Enterprise.

AI Model Coverage

Trakkr tracks its current eight models on every plan; LLM Pulse covers five self-serve surfaces and gates Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and the rest of the 14-model list to Enterprise.

Monitoring & Analysis

Both cover mentions, sentiment, citations, competitor benchmarking, Reddit, and crawler hits, so the day-to-day analysis surface is close.

Cadence & Workflow

Trakkr refreshes daily and turns findings into recommended actions; LLM Pulse runs weekly and is more toolkit than guided workflow.

Integrations & Access

LLM Pulse ships unlimited seats, API, and Data Studio on every public tier; Trakkr keeps API and unlimited seats on its Scale plan.

Best for lean and European teams

A €49 entry, public pricing and unlimited seats make LLM Pulse easy to start on a smaller or EUR-denominated budget.

Best for full-coverage, action-led teams

Teams that need every model tracked daily and a fix workflow get more from Trakkr without stepping up to an Enterprise contract.

Best fit

  • Trakkr: brands and agencies that want every major model tracked daily and a clear path from a visibility gap to a fix.
  • LLM Pulse: cost-conscious or European teams that want transparent self-serve pricing, unlimited seats and broad integrations across the top surfaces.
  • Contextual buying teams: the right shortlist depends on whether full daily coverage or low-entry pricing and integrations matter more.

Not the best fit

  • Teams that want one tool to replace every workflow covered by both Trakkr and LLM Pulse.
  • Buyers choosing only on entry price without checking which models each plan actually tracks.
  • Teams that cannot re-check vendor pricing, model gating and packaging before signing a contract.

Switching guidance

A buyer who ran this comparison.

Evidence, with dates.

Follow each claim to its source. Prices and limits change, so check the date beside each one.
How we compared
This comparison uses public vendor pages and structured Trakkr product facts. Pricing, trial terms, platform coverage, and capabilities were checked against the linked sources. It uses no controlled product-access test, so confirm current limits and contract terms with each vendor before buying.
What we checked
  • Compared public positioning, category fit, and core feature coverage for Trakkr and LLM Pulse.
  • Checked which AI models each plan tracks, including which models LLM Pulse gates to Enterprise.
  • Reviewed tracking cadence, recommended-action workflows, Reddit intelligence and crawler analytics on both sides.
  • Reviewed starting-price context, free-trial availability, seat policy and integration access.
  • Verified LLM Pulse pricing, model gating and features against its live site, and used the live site where our earlier notes disagreed.
  • Reviewed starting-price context, free-tier availability, trial availability, and pricing caveats.
  • Checked whether each tool is stronger for AI visibility, SEO, social listening, content, or adjacent workflows.
Published
11 Mar 2026, updated 17 Sep 2026

Questions,
answered.

About Trakkr and LLM Pulse.

Trakkr tracks eight models on every paid plan: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and Google AI Overviews. LLM Pulse tracks five self-serve surfaces: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews. Enterprise expands to 14 models, including Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek.

See how AI compares your brand.

Track the questions where you and your competitors meet.