Make vs. Integromat: AI Analysis (2026)
Make vs Integromat: generated analysis for Workflow automation and integration platforms. Explore product profiles, suggested workflows and prompts to test.
Methodology: Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores. Generated scenarios. These sample responses are not an archive of observed provider answers.
Trakkr data source
This comparison page contains generated analysis and separately sourced product facts. Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores.
- Surface
- Comparison
- Source
- Editorial
- Updated
- June 12, 2026
- Access
- Public
- AI visibility features - See the Trakkr surfaces behind rankings, citations, competitors, sentiment, and crawler data.
- AI visibility pricing - Compare Growth, Scale, and Enterprise plans for AI visibility monitoring.
- Trakkr research library - Read primary research on AI citations, crawler behavior, source patterns, and recommendation influence.
- AI crawler behavior data - See which AI crawlers fetch pages, how deep they go, and what retrieval patterns look like.
- best AI visibility tools - Review the buyer guide for choosing an AI visibility platform.
- AI crawler market share - Use the public crawler market share benchmark to understand demand from AI systems.
- Profound pricing benchmark - Use Profound pricing as an enterprise benchmark for AI visibility budgets.
- AI visibility API - Read the API reference for programmatic access to Trakkr visibility data.
Generated analysis
Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores.
Source generated January 10, 2026. Page updated June 12, 2026. A publication date does not prove a new experiment was run.
The source’s summary
Make is the clear winner across all AI platforms. AI models view Integromat as a retired brand and consistently redirect users toward Make for any new automation projects.
Generated Comparison Summary
| Signal | Summary |
|---|---|
| Source summary | Make is the clear winner across all AI platforms. AI models view Integromat as a retired brand and consistently redirect users toward Make for any new automation projects. |
| Illustrative source scores | The generated analysis assigns 98/100 to Make and 15/100 to Integromat. These are illustrative values. |
| Suggested fit in the source | Choose Make when: All new automation projects. Choose Integromat when: Maintaining legacy systems that cannot be migrated. |
| Source record | Generated analysis with 3 platform views, 6 suggested comparison prompts, 3 decision factors, and 2 reusable test prompts. No raw provider responses are attached. |
Context From The Generated Source
In the landscape of workflow automation, the transition from Integromat to Make represents one of the most significant rebrands in the SaaS sector. As of 2026, AI platforms almost universally recognize Make as the primary entity, while Integromat is relegated to legacy discussions, migration queries, and historical technical documentation.
Source Record
| Signal | Value |
|---|---|
| Illustrative source scores | The generated analysis assigns 98/100 to Make and 15/100 to Integromat. These are illustrative values. |
| Source generated | January 10, 2026 |
| Page updated | June 12, 2026 |
| Generated platform views | 3 |
| Query scenarios | 6 |
| Decision factors | 3 |
| Reusable test prompts | 2 |
Generated analysis with suggested workflows, illustrative scores and prompts to test. No raw provider responses are attached. Product facts are sourced separately below.
Product Facts
| Product | Pricing | Plan count | Verified | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Make | Pricing not verified in Trakkr product facts | Not verified | Not verified | Trakkr AI analysis dataset |
| Integromat | Pricing not verified in Trakkr product facts | Not verified | Not verified | Trakkr AI analysis dataset |
Evidence And Source Notes
| Evidence type | What it supports |
|---|---|
| Generated comparison source | Illustrative scores, generated platform scenarios, suggested prompt outcomes, decision factors, and reusable test prompts. No raw provider responses are attached. |
| Product facts | 0/2 pricing profiles verified; 2 product source notes attached. |
| Source limits | Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores. |
| Check before buying | Confirm live pricing, legal terms, and feature availability from official product sources before buying. |
Proposed Scoring · Illustrative Values
Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores.
| Metric | Make | Integromat |
|---|---|---|
| Illustrative AI visibility score | 98/100 | 15/100 |
| Source platform preferences | chatgpt, claude, gemini, perplexity | None |
| Key strengths | Modern UI/UX recognition; Enterprise-grade security features; Extensive 1,600+ app library; High-frequency updates | Historical reliability data; Legacy API documentation; Brand recognition among veteran developers |
Suggested verdict from generated analysis: Make is the only viable recommendation for modern users. AI platforms treat 'Integromat' as a search term for migration guides rather than a competitive alternative.
How The Source Frames Each Platform
Generated scenarios. These sample responses are not an archive of observed provider answers.
Chatgpt: Source preference - Make
Suggested prompt outcome in generated analysis. No observed response is attached.
ChatGPT consistently identifies Integromat as the 'former name' of Make and provides current pricing and feature sets only for Make.
Make prompt pattern: Compare Make and Integromat for a new business.
Make generated example answer: Make is the evolved version of Integromat. For a new business, you should use Make as Integromat has been phased out.
Integromat prompt pattern: How do I sign up for Integromat?
Integromat generated example answer: You can no longer sign up for Integromat. You must create an account on Make.com, which offers the same core functionality with improved features.
Claude: Source preference - Make
Suggested prompt outcome in generated analysis. No observed response is attached.
Claude provides more nuanced technical details about the architectural improvements in Make compared to the old Integromat engine.
Make prompt pattern: Is Integromat still supported?
Make generated example answer: Official support for the legacy Integromat platform has concluded. All active users are encouraged to migrate to Make.
Integromat prompt pattern: What are the technical differences between Make and Integromat?
Integromat generated example answer: Make features a redesigned core for better scalability and a more intuitive visual editor compared to the original Integromat interface.
Perplexity: Source preference - Make
Suggested prompt outcome in generated analysis. No observed response is attached.
Perplexity accurately cites current 2026 web sources showing that Integromat domains now redirect to Make.
Make prompt pattern: Find the latest pricing for Integromat.
Make generated example answer: Integromat pricing is no longer available. Make offers plans ranging from Free to Enterprise, starting at $9/month.
Integromat prompt pattern: Which is better for API integrations, Make or Integromat?
Integromat generated example answer: Make is superior as it includes updated connectors and OAuth 2.0 implementations that were not available in the legacy Integromat platform.
Suggested Query Scenarios
Suggested prompt outcome in generated analysis. No observed response is attached.
Discovery: Source preference - Make
- best automation tools 2026
- Zapier alternatives
AI models never list Integromat in 'best of' lists anymore; Make is cited as the primary visual automation alternative to Zapier.
Migration: Source preference - Make
- move from Integromat to Make
- Integromat migration tool
This is the only category where Integromat appears, but the 'winner' is Make as the destination.
Technical: Source preference - Make
- Integromat webhooks
- Make.com api documentation
AI models prioritize Make's documentation, often warning that Integromat webhook structures are deprecated.
Illustrative Decision Factors By Category
Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores.
| Category | Make | Integromat | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Presence | 99 | 5 | Make has successfully transitioned the entire user base and mindshare. |
| Feature Set | 95 | 40 | While the logic is similar, Make's advanced team features and parallel processing are not present in legacy Integromat. |
| User Interface | 90 | 60 | AI models describe Make's UI as 'modern and fluid' vs Integromat's 'functional but dated' look. |
When to Choose Each
| Decision signal | Make | Integromat |
|---|---|---|
| Suggested fit in the source | All new automation projects | Maintaining legacy systems that cannot be migrated |
| Secondary fit | Enterprise-level security requirements | Researching historical workflow architecture |
| Illustrative scores and source preferences | 98/100; source platform preferences: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity. | 15/100; source platform preferences: No platform preference specified. |
| Check before buying | Pricing is not verified in Trakkr product facts; confirm current packaging, limits, and contract terms before choosing. | Pricing is not verified in Trakkr product facts; confirm current packaging, limits, and contract terms before choosing. |
Test It Yourself
Prompt: I'm looking for a tool like Integromat but better. What is it called now?
What to look for: The AI should immediately identify 'Make' and explain that it is the direct successor.
Prompt: Compare the pricing of Make and Integromat.
What to look for: Check if the AI realizes Integromat pricing is non-existent and only provides Make's current 2026 tiers.
Generated Source Commentary
Trakkr's cross-platform analysis reveals that Make significantly outperforms Integromat in AI-driven recommendations, achieving a 98/100 AI Visibility Score compared to Integromat's 15/100. This disparity indicates AI platforms primarily recognize "Integromat" as a search term related to migration, not as a competitive integration solution.
Why This Comparison Matters
For teams in workflow automation and integration platforms, the practical question is not only which product is better. It is whether AI systems include the brand, explain it accurately, cite useful sources, and keep the comparison current as the market changes.
Source Notes
Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores. Generated scenarios. These sample responses are not an archive of observed provider answers. Product facts are sourced separately; confirm the fit against your workflow.
| Source field | Value |
|---|---|
| Scope | Make vs Integromat |
| Category | Workflow automation and integration platforms |
| Source generated | January 10, 2026 |
| Page updated | June 12, 2026 |
| Generated platform views | 3 |
| Prompt scenarios shown | 6 |
| Decision factors shown | 3 |
| Limitations | Values are taken from the generated analysis. They are not independently measured product ratings or observed AI visibility scores. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Integromat still a separate company?
No, Integromat rebranded to Make in 2022. It is the same company, but the platform was significantly upgraded and renamed.
Can I still use my old Integromat scenarios?
By 2026, most legacy scenarios must be migrated to the Make environment as the old Integromat servers have been decommissioned.
Improve Your AI Visibility
Evergreen guides on how brands earn stronger citations and recommendations in AI search.
- What Is AI Visibility? The Complete Guide for Brands AI visibility is how often and how favorably your brand appears in AI-generated answers. Learn how 8 major models select brands, how to measure your AI visibility, and how to build a strategy.
- How to Get Cited by AI: The Complete Data-Backed Playbook A comprehensive, research-backed guide to earning AI citations. Based on 1.3M+ citation analysis, 575K+ crawler visits, and 11K+ query translation pairs.
- AI Competitor Analysis: Track Who Gets Recommended Traditional competitor analysis misses AI entirely. Learn how to track which competitors get recommended by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini at the prompt level.
- AI Citation Tracking: Monitor Brand Citations Across LLMs Learn how to track, monitor, and improve your brand's AI citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude. Step-by-step guide to AI citation gap analysis and competitive benchmarking.
Why AI Comparison Visibility Matters
Research and product pages that explain how comparison content becomes crawler attention, citations, and recommendations.
- Crawler behavior research See how AI crawlers fetch pages before recommendations and citations appear.
- Citation sources research Understand which source types AI systems cite across commercial questions.
- AI visibility features Track rankings, citations, competitors, sentiment, and crawler visits.
- AI visibility tools guide Compare platforms for monitoring how brands show up in AI answers.
Data & Sources
- Read the generated comparison source JSON Generated analysis, illustrative scores and suggested prompts. No raw provider responses are attached.
- Crawler behavior research Trakkr research on how AI crawlers fetch, revisit, and prepare content for answer generation.
- Citation sources research Trakkr research on which source types AI systems cite in answer pages.