Comparison pages
Flat before, a step up the week the page is first cited
Change in recommendation rate against the same brands’ never-cited prompts, by week.
| Weeks from first citation | Points |
|---|---|
| -8 | −0.7 |
| -7 | −0.5 |
| -6 | −0.5 |
| -5 | +0.1 |
| -4 | −0.6 |
| -3 | −0.3 |
| -2 | −0.5 |
| -1 | 0.0 |
| 0 | +3.6 |
| 1 | +2.7 |
| 2 | +2.4 |
| 3 | +3.0 |
| 4 | +3.1 |
| 5 | +3.2 |
| 6 | +3.4 |
| 7 | +3.3 |
| 8 | +2.4 |
Nearly a third of the pages AI cites for a brand name a rival
Citation is evidence, recommendation is the verdict. Medians per brand, from the first run in June 2026.
Bigger where AI searches the web. Nothing when it answers from memory.
Each estimate with its likely range, in points of recommendation rate.
Common questions
Is being cited by AI the same as being recommended?
No. A model can quote your page as a source and still recommend a competitor as its top pick. In this study, owned pages are a median 4.6% of what AI cites about a brand, and nearly a third of cited pages name a rival. Citation is evidence; recommendation is the verdict.
Why does AI cite my page but recommend a competitor?
Comparison and "best of" pages are the pages AI reaches for, and those pages name rivals by design. So the page you wrote to win becomes the evidence the model uses to list everyone else. The less visible a brand already is, the more its citations leak into a competitor recommendation.
Do comparison pages actually help you get recommended?
The October 2026 rerun found a 3.0-point exploratory estimate around the first observed citation of an owned page, and 3.6 points in the citation week itself. It is not treated as causal: publication timing was unavailable, and in the first run a publish-anchored estimate crossed zero and placebo estimates were positive.
What did the engine split show?
The exploratory estimate was larger for answers built on web search (6.0 points) than for answers from memory (0.0). That pattern is suggestive, but it does not establish that the page caused the recommendation change.
Quasi-experimental, not a randomized trial. The effect is dated to first citation, not publication. Controls are the same brands’ prompts whose own pages were never cited as of 16 Oct 2026. Brand-level rows are withheld.