Skip to content

Mentions.so review.

What it does well. Who should buy it.

Shortlist it for affordable daily mention tracking.

Low prices, unlimited seats and AI traffic analytics. Prompt limits and Starter model coverage are modest.

The case for it.
The reasons to pause.

Our judgement of the public product and buying model. These are trade-offs to weigh, not results from a performance benchmark.

Where Mentions.so earns a place

Low public prices

$49-$399/month makes Mentions.so easy to test.

Unlimited seats

All plans include unlimited seats.

AI traffic analytics included

Traffic context is available even on the low end.

What to check before committing

Prompt ceilings are modest

Public plans top out at 300 prompts.

Starter model coverage is limited

Starter tracks three LLMs.

Lighter enterprise controls

API, governance, and advanced reporting are not the public focus.

What is
in the box?

The main parts of Mentions.so, with our view on each.

Vendor-described capabilities
Plan access varies
Read the full feature analysis

Monitors brand mentions across AI answer surfaces.

Simple and accessible.

Connects AI visibility to traffic.

Useful for lean teams.

No seat sprawl across plans.

Strong at this price.

Five sites on Pro, ten on Business, and unlimited sites on Agency.

Good for small agencies.

Guidance on Pro and above.

Helpful but lightweight.

Supports major LLM and AI overview surfaces.

Best on Pro and above.

Choose for the work
you need to do.

Our view on buyer fit. Start with the job, then test the plan and workflow in a demo or trial.

A good fit
  • Lean teams
  • Small agencies
  • Founders
  • Teams that need affordable daily AI mention monitoring
Look elsewhere
  • Enterprise programs
  • Large prompt libraries
  • Teams needing API-first workflows
  • Buyers needing deep source/crawler intelligence

Mentions.so vs Trakkr,
row by row.

We make Trakkr, so read this with that in mind. Each row comes from the two products’ public pages.

Read the full head-to-head
Mentions.so and Trakkr compared
Mentions.soTrakkrOur product
CategoryAffordable AI visibility + insightsFull-stack AI visibility + action
Public pricing$49-$399/moPublished plans, 14-day free trial
Self-serve startPublic signup14-day free trial, instant signup
AI models called out3 LLMs on Starter, all LLMs on Pro+8 AI models on every plan
Citation opportunitiesYesYes
Prompt volume25-300 public promptsPlan-based prompt libraries for visibility programs
Agency featuresAgency plan has white labeling and custom domainAgency workflow + client portal support
Reddit intelligenceNot publicly visibleBuilt in
Crawler analyticsPublicly shown, depth to verifyBuilt in as a core workflow
Best forLow-cost daily AI mention monitoringTeams that want monitoring plus action at scale

Read the evidence.

2 maintained sources
Each check date shown below

How this review was researched

We reviewed Mentions.so’s public product, pricing and documentation pages. Capabilities are vendor descriptions; the verdict and buyer fit are our editorial judgement.

Trakkr is our product and competes with Mentions.so. Plan details can change, so confirm the scope with the vendor.

  1. [1]Mentions.so homepage mentions.so
  2. [2]Mentions.so pricing mentions.so/#pricing

Questions, answered.

The ones buyers ask most about Mentions.so.

Mentions.so (brand name: Mentions) is an AI brand-monitoring tool. It tracks how AI models mention your brand, compares visibility across LLMs, surfaces an insights board, shows AI traffic analytics, and advertises crawler analytics. In practice, that makes it an affordable AI visibility monitoring and action tool for lean teams and small agencies.

Ask anything else, like “Is Mentions.so worth it for a small team?”Ask anything else

The Agent answers from our docs, methods and pricing, and links to the source.

Know where you stand first.

We make Trakkr, a rival to Mentions. Its free snapshot shows how AI answers name your brand today, whichever tool you pick.