Mentions.so Review: Cheap AI Visibility Tracking With Real Limits
Mentions.so is now a clearer, lower-cost AI visibility option than it used to look from the outside. Public pricing runs from $49 to $399/month, Pro and above track all supported LLMs, and the product includes AI traffic and crawler analytics. The tradeoff is prompt depth, enterprise proof, and specialist workflow maturity.
Founder, Trakkr
Category
AI visibility + insights + crawler analytics
Closer to a low-cost operating dashboard than a research-heavy enterprise platform.
Public pricing
$49-$399/mo
Four public monthly plans with prompt, site, model, and agency limits visible on the homepage.
Primary models
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Perplexity, AIO
Starter tracks 3 LLMs; Pro and above advertise all supported LLMs.
Best fit
Agencies and lean growth teams
Especially teams that want visibility, outreach, and content in one workflow.
Quick answer
Is Mentions.so worth it in 2026?
Mentions.so is an AI brand-monitoring tool. Pricing is Starter $49, Pro $99, Business $199, and Agency $399/mo, with no free trial listed. Trakkr is $100/mo with all 8 models and a 14-day trial. Pro and above track all supported LLMs, every plan includes unlimited seats, and the public site shows AI traffic analytics, an insights board, and crawler analytics.
It is worth it if you want affordable daily AI visibility tracking and can live with modest prompt limits. The ceiling is the issue: Starter only tracks three LLMs, public plans top out at 300 prompts, and the deeper enterprise, Reddit, source-forensics, and crawler-workflow story is thinner than specialist platforms. For AI visibility with more operational depth, all 8 AI models on every plan, and Reddit/crawler intelligence built in, try Trakkr. See alternatives or start a free scan.
Best for
Avoid if
Our rating
Decision guide
When Trakkr is better than Mentions.so
Trakkr is the better Mentions.so alternative when you want all 8 AI models on every plan, true AI-crawler analytics, Reddit monitoring, and recommended actions in one predictable bill. Choose Mentions.so when its lower entry price and its $399 white-label agency tier matter more than evidence depth.
| Trigger | Trakkr fit | Choose Mentions.so if |
|---|---|---|
| Model coverage | All 8 AI models on every plan from $100/mo Growth. | Mentions.so Starter tracks only 3 LLMs; all 8 need Pro ($99/mo) or above. |
| Crawler analytics | Server-log AI-crawler analytics show which AI bots visited your site. | Its "AI traffic analytics" measures AI referral traffic, not server-log AI-bot crawls. |
| Depth: Reddit and actions | Reddit monitoring, citation depth, and recommended Agent actions in one workflow. | Mentions.so is lighter on evidence, with an insights board rather than crawler or Reddit depth. |
| Price and white-label | Fixed pricing, software-first, with SOC 2 status named honestly. | Choose Mentions.so for its lower $49 entry price and its $399 Agency tier with 100% white-label. |
This block is editorial guidance, not hidden crawler text: the same comparison is visible to readers and reflected in the verified capability record below.
How we verified Mentions
How we evaluated: We checked Mentions’s official site, pricing page, documentation, and public reviews against Trakkr’s structured product-fact record. Pricing and feature claims were last verified on June 19, 2026. Trakkr is our own product; that bias is named, and where Mentions genuinely wins we say so.
- Sources checked
- 2
- Pricing verified
- June 19, 2026
- AI platforms
- 8 (3 core)
- Free trial
- Unverified
Feature claims verified
Citation tracking
Tracks brand mentions and what each model says about you across AI answers.
Crawler analytics
Its "AI traffic analytics" measures AI referral traffic, not server-log AI-bot crawls.
Reddit monitoring
No Reddit or community-source monitoring is documented on public pages.
Competitor tracking
Real-time competitor visibility comparison.
Sentiment / perception
Brand sentiment and perception tracking across AI answers.
Reporting
Report generation plus an actionable insights board; tailored insights on higher tiers.
Agency / white-label
Agency tier ($399/mo) adds 100% white-label, a custom domain, unlimited sites and seats, and priority support.
Enterprise / security
No SOC 2, SSO, or GDPR claim is published on the site.
Publicly confirmed
- 8 AI engines tracked (Starter limited to 3)
- Unlimited seats and daily tracking on every plan
- Citation, competitor, and sentiment tracking
- Agency tier with 100% white-label and a custom domain
Not publicly confirmed
- Any free trial (length, card, eligible plans)
- Reddit or community-source monitoring
- Server-log AI-bot crawler analytics (only referral traffic is confirmed)
- SOC 2, SSO, or GDPR posture
- Public API access
Best-fit buyer
Small brands and agencies that want an affordable, action-oriented AI-mention tracker with built-in white-label reselling.
Main caveat
The "AI traffic analytics" is referral traffic, not crawler-log analytics, and Starter tracks only 3 of 8 models, so all-engine coverage needs Pro ($99/mo) or above.
Trakkr’s own record
For reference, Trakkr tracks 8 AI models on every paid plan with citation tracking, AI crawler analytics, Reddit intelligence, competitor share, perception scoring, and recommended actions in one workflow, on a 14-day free trial from $100-$500/mo + Enterprise.
Sources checked
- Mentions.so homepage· checked June 19, 2026
- Mentions.so pricing· checked June 19, 2026
What Mentions is
Mentions, published on mentions.so, positions itself around daily AI visibility monitoring rather than traditional SEO rankings. The public page now shows plan cards, AI traffic analytics, crawler analytics, an insights board, and model coverage across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, AI Overview, and Llama. In plain English, it is trying to make AI visibility approachable for teams that do not want an enterprise sales cycle.
That is the right category call. Mentions overlaps with AI visibility because it tracks how brands appear across major AI engines. But it is not a research-heavy analytics platform in the way Profound is, and it is not as SEO-utility-heavy as LLMrefs. The public prompt caps and lightweight proof surface make it feel like an efficient low-cost monitor first.
That is not inherently bad. For some teams, especially agencies, the difference matters: it is easier to sell a tool with clear pricing, unlimited seats, and simple action guidance than one that only tells you where you stand.
Pricing and buying signals
Mentions.so now publishes clean plan cards. The important buying question is not whether pricing exists, it is whether the prompt limits and model gates are enough for your monitoring program.
| Signal | Status | What I found |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $49/mo | 25 prompts, daily updates, 1 site, unlimited seats, 3 LLMs, and AI traffic analytics. |
| Pro | $99/mo | 50 prompts, 5 sites, unlimited seats, all LLMs, AI traffic analytics, and tailored insights. |
| Business | $199/mo | 100 prompts, 10 sites, unlimited seats, all LLMs, AI traffic analytics, and tailored insights. |
| Agency | $399/mo | 300 prompts, unlimited sites, pitch workspace, custom domain, white labeling, and priority support. |
What would Mentions cost for your team?
Mentions.so is cheap to start, but the public plans are capped by prompt volume and site count. Use the calculator to see where those caps land against Trakkr:
Price check: Mentions vs Trakkr
Mentions.so starts at $49/mo and reaches $399/mo for Agency. The tradeoff is prompt volume: 25, 50, 100, or 300 public prompts depending on plan.
mentions.so
$99/mo, 50 prompts, 5 sites, all LLMs
$99/mo
trakkr.ai
$100/mo
Start free scanWhat Mentions does well
The category fit is real
Mentions is not pretending to be a generic social listening tool. It is explicitly built around AI model responses, citation opportunities, competitor benchmarking, and outreach. That puts it in the right neighborhood for AI visibility buyers.
It combines monitoring with action
A lot of tools stop at dashboards. Mentions.so goes further with an insights board, tailored recommendations, AI traffic analytics, and crawler analytics. That makes the product feel closer to a lightweight operating dashboard than a passive tracker.
The entry story is low friction and transparent
The public plan ladder starts at $49/month and scales to $399/month for agencies. That matters in a category where many vendors hide behind demos before you can see a single result.
Agency language is baked in
The positioning is clearly agency-friendly. White-label reporting and AI traffic analytics are called out in third-party coverage, and the homepage leans heavily on practical use cases rather than abstract brand language.
The model coverage is broad above Starter
The public page calls out ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, AI Overview, and Llama. Starter is limited to three LLMs, but Pro and above advertise all supported LLMs.
It is easy to explain internally
“Track what AI says about us, find citation opportunities, and run outreach to get mentioned more” is a clean story for non-specialists. That is a real strength if your team wants quick alignment.
Where Mentions falls short
Prompt ceilings are modest
The pricing is accessible, but the public prompt limits are 25, 50, 100, and 300. That is enough for a focused program, but agencies and larger brands can hit the ceiling quickly.
Enterprise proof is thin from the outside
I could not verify strong public security, compliance, or enterprise procurement signals from the homepage surface alone. If your buying process depends on those details, you will need a sales conversation.
Starter is materially narrower than the headline story
Starter includes one site and three LLMs. The broader all-LLM story begins at Pro, so the cheapest plan is better for a pilot than a complete visibility program.
Brand naming consistency can still confuse buyers
User intent often lands on "mentions.so" and the brand is Mentions. Keep naming consistent in every touchpoint so buyers do not have to decode whether terms refer to one product or two.
Crawler analytics appear early but still need buyer validation
The public page now includes a crawler analytics section, but the exact depth of bot-level logs, exports, and operational workflows is not as explicit as in stronger specialist platforms.
Feature deep-dive
Track Mentions
The core promise is straightforward: monitor AI model responses in real time and see when your brand appears across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. That is the right foundation for any visibility product.
Verdict: Good core monitoring, but the public proof surface stops before it becomes truly deep.
Citation Opportunities
Mentions says it identifies websites and content creators that influence AI model responses. That turns the product from a passive tracker into an outreach source map, which is exactly the kind of bridge a lean team wants.
Verdict: One of the more useful ideas in the product because it points to action, not just observation.
Insights Board
The product shows a Kanban-style workflow for recommendations, including source, citation, audit, sentiment, and narrative tasks. That is the right shape for teams that want to improve visibility, not just measure it.
Verdict: A useful action layer for lean teams, though buyers should verify workflow depth before replacing a specialist platform.
Tailored insights
Pro and above include tailored insights, and the homepage positions the product around practical fixes such as content gaps, sentiment issues, and source opportunities.
Verdict: Useful if the recommendations stay specific; less useful if they become generic tasks.
Competitor Benchmarking
The site explicitly references competitor benchmarking and trend analysis. That is important, because AI visibility without competitive context is just a count. You need to know whether you are improving relative to the market.
Verdict: Necessary, but I would want to verify how much depth is available behind the claim.
Multi-platform visibility
The public copy highlights the major answer engines that matter today, with all-LLM tracking on Pro and above. Starter is intentionally narrower.
Verdict: Strong coverage for the price once you are above Starter.
The important distinction
Mentions is useful if your job is to turn AI visibility into action. It is less useful if you want the deepest possible measurement layer. In other words, it is built for the team that wants to do something next, not the team that wants to argue about the dashboard first.
Who should use Mentions?
Best for
- Agencies that want a simple way to show AI visibility value to clients
- Lean marketing teams that care about outreach and content as much as monitoring
- Brands that want to start with AI visibility without a long procurement cycle
- Teams that need a practical workflow around citation opportunities
- Buyers who prefer a single tool for tracking + outreach + content drafting
Not for
- Enterprise buyers that require heavy compliance and governance proof up front
- Analysts who need deep response capture and methodology-level rigor
- Brands with large prompt libraries that will outgrow 300 public prompts
- Teams that need Reddit intelligence or a more complete operating system
Mentions vs Trakkr: feature-by-feature comparison
| Feature | Mentions | Trakkr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Affordable AI visibility + insights | Full-stack AI visibility + action |
| Public pricing | $49-$399/mo | Free tier + transparent paid plans |
| Self-serve start | Public signup | Free tier, instant signup |
| AI models called out | 3 LLMs on Starter, all LLMs on Pro+ | 8 AI models on every plan |
| Citation opportunities | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt volume | 25-300 public prompts | Plan-based prompt libraries for visibility programs |
| Agency features | Agency plan has white labeling and custom domain | Agency workflow + client portal support |
| Reddit intelligence | Not publicly visible | Built in |
| Crawler analytics | Publicly shown, depth to verify | Built in as a core workflow |
| Best for | Low-cost daily AI mention monitoring | Teams that want monitoring plus action at scale |
Transparent pricing, 14-day free trial
More workflow depth once low-cost monitoring is not enough. all 8 AI models on every plan.
Mentions alternatives
If you need transparent pricing, deeper analytics, or stronger public proof, these tools cover AI visibility with different tradeoffs. Trakkr is our own product, the rest are listed by editorial relevance.
| Tool | Why consider | Review |
|---|---|---|
TrakkrRecommended trakkr.ai | all 8 core AI models on every paid plan with a 14-day trial. Citation tracking, Reddit intelligence, crawler analytics, and Agent recommendations without a demo call. | Start free |
| Profound tryprofound.com | Enterprise AI visibility platform with unique Prompt Volumes data and a steep pricing curve. | Read |
| AthenaHQ athenahq.ai | Action-oriented GEO platform with strong workflows, but credit-based pricing makes spend less predictable. | Read |
| Ahrefs ahrefs.com | Still elite for SEO, with Brand Radar now credible enough to matter for AI search visibility. | Read |
| Semrush semrush.com | Broad SEO suite with a real AI visibility layer, though pricing and packaging stay layered. | Read |
| Scrunch AI scrunch.com | Well-funded AI visibility platform now owned by Sitecore, with AI bot-traffic analytics and page audits, though the best features start higher up the ladder. | Read |
| Conductor conductor.com | Enterprise SEO platform whose AI search layer now feels real if you need search, content, and governance together. | Read |
The bottom line
Mentions is a credible, category-appropriate AI visibility product, but it is closer to an affordable daily monitor than a research platform. If your priority is getting started cheaply with public pricing, unlimited seats, and simple insights, it makes sense. If you need higher prompt volume, deeper analytics, Reddit intelligence, or a stronger enterprise proof layer, better options exist.
I reviewed Mentions.so's public homepage, pricing cards, visible feature claims, model coverage, prompt limits, agency packaging, AI traffic analytics, and crawler analytics language. Pricing and packaging are time-sensitive here, so recheck before buying.
Quick answers about Mentions.so
What is Mentions?
Mentions is an affordable AI visibility monitoring product with daily tracking, AI traffic analytics, unlimited seats, all-LLM coverage on Pro and above, and an Agency tier with white labeling and unlimited sites.
What is Mentions best for?
Small brands and agencies that want an affordable, action-oriented AI-mention tracker with built-in white-label reselling.
Does Mentions track ChatGPT citations?
Yes. Tracks brand mentions and what each model says about you across AI answers. ChatGPT is among the 8 AI platforms Mentions tracks, so you can see which sources it cites in ChatGPT answers.
How much does Mentions cost?
Mentions costs $49-$399/mo. Plans: Starter at $49/mo, Pro at $99/mo, Business at $199/mo, and Agency at $399/mo. No free trial is advertised; the only public CTA is a paid sign-up, and length and card terms are not stated.
What are the best Mentions alternatives?
The most-cited Mentions alternatives are Trakkr, Otterly AI, and LLM Pulse. The right pick depends on whether you want broader model coverage, crawler analytics, Reddit intelligence, agency white-label, or a lower entry price. See the full ranked Mentions alternatives list.
When is Trakkr better than Mentions?
Trakkr is the better fit when you want all 8 AI models on every paid plan (no per-model add-ons), a self-serve free trial on every plan, AI crawler analytics on every plan, recommended Agent actions in the same workflow, and predictable pricing from $100-$500/mo + Enterprise.
When should you choose Mentions instead of Trakkr?
Choose Mentions instead of Trakkr when small brands and agencies that want an affordable, action-oriented AI-mention tracker with built-in white-label reselling..
See how AI talks about your brand
Enter your domain to get a free AI visibility report in under 60 seconds.